Recent
years witnessed the Philippines waging war against terrorists and lawless
elements involved in trafficking in persons and drugs, money laundering,
arms smuggling, and intellectual property theft. The country continues
to experience the adverse impacts of criminal operations, more so being
included in watchlists of international institutions such as the Paris-based
Financial Action Task Force on matters related to money laundering,
and the U.S. State Department on trafficking in persons.
Cognizant of this condition, among other critical and strategic concerns,
the Philippine government stepped up its drive against transnational
crime and terrorism by launching a series of major initiatives spearheaded
by the Office of the President, the Philippine National Police, Armed
Forces of the Philippines, Department of Justice and other law enforcement
agencies.
Among its major milestones is the passage of important laws and policies
that likewise brought the creation of inter-agency bodies to fight terrorism,
trafficking in persons and drugs, arms smuggling, money laundering,
intellectual property theft, cybercrime, sea piracy, cultural property
theft, economic crime and environmental crime.
In addition, the Philippine government is determined
to implement reform programs to enhance governance in support of the
Comprehensive Programme to Combat Transnational Organized Crime (CPCTOC).
The CPCTOC outlines the country’s comprehensive approach to concretely
address terrorism and all forms of transnational organized crime through
the following priority areas:
1. legislation and policy development;
2. institutional capacity-building especially strengthening
the law enforcement agencies, banking and finance institutions and local
government units;
3. training of selected government personnel toward
organizing a pool of anti-transnational crime specialists;
4. strategic research, information and intelligence
gathering; and,
5. international cooperation.
Specifically, the CPCTOC contains the following salient
strategies geared toward attaining the consensus vision and three broad
goals contained in Part III of this document:
1. harmonization of Philippine laws and ensuring that
these are likewise harmonized with laws, policies and procedures of
international partners;
2. active involvement and participation of local government
units in the fight against terrorism and transnational organized crime;
3. establishing a national integrated information
and intelligence network through a shared central data base that builds
on the advances of information and communication technology including
networking with selected international partners like the Interpol I-24/7;
4. modernization of anti-terrorism and anti-transnational
crime units both at the national and local government levels;
5. simplifying operations systems and establishing
focal points for each category of transnational organized crime, both
at the national and local levels;
6. partnering with civil society for peace and order,
public safety and local and national security;
7. pursuing judicial reforms;
8. training of selected national and local government
personnel and establishing a pool of anti-terrorism and anti-transnational
crime specialists;
9. continuing conduct of strategic research, case
studies on good practices and cross-country comparative studies identifying
critical success factors and models to prevent, combat and eradicate
transnational organized crime; and
10. expanding and improving international relations,
both multilateral and bilateral.
The latter strategy likewise seeks to harness technical assistance and
financial resources to develop the capacity of government especially
law enforcement agencies and personnel in the implementation of various
international agreements resulting from United Nations Conventions,
and gatherings of the members of the Association of Southeast Asian
Nations (ASEAN) as well as the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC).
The Philippine government shall continue to strengthen
and pursue cross-border criminal justice cooperation against transnational
criminal groups and their financial and social support structures. Internally,
the Philippine government under the new administration shall aggressively
pursue reengineering of specific units for effective performance, curb
corruption at all levels, and optimize all resources for the country’s
sustained growth and development.
The sustainability of all strategies to prevent, combat
and eradicate transnational crime can only happen when the country’s
poverty situation has been significantly alleviated, the public sector
especially government, has been cleansed from graft and corruption,
and the Filipino people have been eventually empowered in the total
effort to protect and uphold national sovereignty, universal human rights
and civil liberties.
Why a Philippine Comprehensive Programme to Combat
Transnational Organized Crime (CPCTOC)
Emerging Nature of Transnational Crime
The internationalization of crimes especially those linked to terrorism;
trafficking in drugs and persons; various forms of smuggling and money
laundering; piracy and armed robbery against ships; illicit trade in
small arms and light weapons; and intellectual property theft, has significantly
affected the Philippines at varying degrees.
Transnational crime and terrorism are converging.
Terrorist organizations, bereft of state support, are increasingly turning
to transnational crime activities, such as narcotics trafficking and
intellectual property theft, among others, to finance their activities.
Various reports worldwide manifest that criminal organizations, for
instance, enter into agreements with terrorist groups to trade light
weapons or bomb and other explosive materials. At various levels, this
convergence is growing.
Financing terrorism and transnational organized crime
build on lax banking laws and ease of virtual transactions. Money laundering
is said to be rife throughout Asia. As the proceeds of international
crime grow, transnational criminal organizations are looking for ways
to launder their money, and Asia, with the developing and underdeveloped
conditions of most its member countries, becomes a major avenue for
money flow.
Facilitating Trends
Globalization, open economies and market, modernization especially advances
in internet and communication technology, increasing mobility of people
and borderless inter-cultural exchange, provide a facilitative landscape
for criminal networks to operate. Developing and underdeveloped countries
including the Philippines, with their current volatile socio-economic
conditions tend to provide a conducive environment for criminal elements
to victimize and co-opt many of the poor.
Vulnerability of the Philippines to Transnational
Crime.
The threats posed by transnational organized crime and terrorism affect
the Philippines in many ways specifically, as follows: (a) social structures,
(b) economy and financing institutions including the natural and physical
resources upon which the economy depends, and (c) the regional and the
international communities where a significant sector of the population
of contract and other overseas workers are Filipinos.
Illegal drugs from foreign lands enter Filipino homes,
schools, shopping malls and streets where the country’s most vulnerable
– the children and youth roam. Human traffickers prey on the innocent
poor especially young women from rural areas, who are lured by employment
opportunities abroad but soon find themselves slaves and victims of
the flesh trade and labor exploitation.
Wide-scale distribution and sale of smuggled contrabands go though the
archipelago’s porous borders and unguarded coastlines. Whether
these are perpetuated by local or foreign elements, the Philippines
stands to lose. International media cited the Philippines as either
a transit or drop off point for paraphernalia or used for staging illicit
activities as well as training ground for foreign terrorist and criminals.
These alleged linkages pose the greatest threat to
the country’s unstable economy and fragile image as recently indicated
by the decline of the investment climate in the late nineties up to
the start of the new millennium.
The Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies (APCSS)
identified Indonesia and the Philippines as the most vulnerable to transnational
crime in the region owing to the countries’ porous borders and
characteristic critical factors especially “corruption, mass unemployment
and economic malaise”.
Anti-Transnational Crime Initiatives
Affected by the threats of terrorism and transnational organized crime,
the government has not reneged on its commitments, thus, continues to
improve its internal coordination with a focus on building the capacity
of all its units. Externally, the Philippines has always been an active
member and signatory to international treaties, covenants, and declarations
of the United Nations and other related international institutions.
Fully committed to the sovereignty, security and safety
of the Filipino people, to the country’s institutions and resources,
to attainment of peace and order, harmony among all nations, and to
universal principles, the government under the present administration,
created critical units to craft the country’s programme to combat
terrorism and all forms of transnational organized crime, as well as
to manage the effects and menace that these bring.
Year 2003 was a hallmark year for the Philippines
in terms of its progress in legal and institutional framework. Among
the salient laws passed and/or bodies created for this purpose are,
namely:
4.1. Anti-Terrorism Task Force was created in April
2004 by President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo and is headed by the Secretary
of National Defense supported by a composite team from various government
agencies including related task forces such as those of the Philippine
National Police and local government (e.g., anti-illegal drugs, anti
smuggling and anti-kidnapping);
4.2. A Task Force for the Security of Critical Infrastructures under
the Cabinet Oversight Committee on Internal Security;
4.3. Anti-Money Laundering Amendment Act (March 2003), which enables
the Philippines to avoid sanctions by the Paris-based Financial Action
Task Force;
4.4. Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act of 2003;
In support of this law, President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo created an
Anti-Illegal Recruiters Task Force in July 2004.
4.5. In 2003, the Philippine Senate ratified the following United Nations
Conventions:
a. Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts of Violence at Airports
Serving International Civil Aviation;
b. Convention on the Making of Plastic Explosives for the Purpose of
Identification (Montreal Convention 1991);
c. International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombing;
d. Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety
of Fixed Platforms located on the Continental Shelf;
e. International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of
Terrorism;
f. Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety
of Maritime Navigation;
g. The Philippines was one of 21 countries to have signed the Anti-Corruption
Action Plan for Asia and the Pacific, which was developed with assistance
from ADB and the Organization for Economic.
Executive Order No. 265, s. 2004
True to its commitment to these instrumentalities, and to its inherent
responsibility to protect the lives and rights of Filipinos, the Philippine
government, under the Filipinos, the Philippine government, under the
Administration of President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, established major
mechanisms and provided support to solve the problem at its roots.
On January 23, 2004, President Arroyo issued Executive
Order no. 265,”Defining the Approach and Institutional Mechanism
for the Government’s Comprehensive Program on Combating Transnational
Crime.”
This Executive Order likewise established the Office
of the Special Envoy on Transnational Crime (OSETC) as “an oversight
body to provide the critical link between and among local, national,
regional and international agencies and organizations in forging agreements,
concretizing cooperation and harmonizing action.”
Foremost its critical functions, the OSETC is mandated
“to orchestrate efforts at the highest echelons of policy and
decision-making, not only to underscore the importance of combating
transnational crime in establishing and sustaining our Strong Republic,
but also to ensure proper guidelines for the various instrumentalities
of government which have different mandates in dealing with transnational
crime.”
Parameters of the CPCTOC
The Comprehensive Programme on Transnational Organized Crime must be
viewed in the light of the legal framework provided by the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, Naples Political declaration and Global
Plan of Action in 1994, the 29th ASEAN Ministerial Meeting in 1996,
the ASEAN Declaration on Transnational Crime in 1997 and other major
relevant international instrumentalities that have been ratified by
the country and/or where the Philippines is a signatory.
Further, pertinent provisions of the Philippine Constitution,
relevant Republic Acts like the Revised Penal Code, Executive Orders,
and Administrative Orders, among other issuances at the national and
local levels of government underpin the primary purpose of developing
the Programme.
Among the more important and relevant issuances pertain
to the creation of the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency, Philippine
Center on Transnational Crime, Office of the Special Envoy on Transnational
Crime, Information Technology and E-Commerce Council, Anti-Terrorism
Task Force, Cabinet Oversight Committee on Critical Infrastructure,
Inter-Agency Council on Anti-Trafficking in Persons, Anti-Money Laundering
Council, and other appropriate bodies to combat terrorism and trafficking
in human beings.
The Programme must likewise be considered as an instrument
to guide relevant national and local bodies especially the government,
in helping ensure the synergy and efficacy of approaches and initiatives
in combating transnational crime in the country.
Categories of Transnational Crime. There are
eleven categories of transnational crime described in this document
and in the two other volumes of the CPCTOC, as follows:
(1) terrorism, (2) illegal drug trafficking, (3) trafficking in persons,
(4) arms smuggling, (5) sea piracy, (6) money laundering, (7) intellectual
property theft, (8) cultural property theft, (9) cybercrime, (10) economic
crime, and (11) environmental crime. |